top of page
SU Mountain Logo SM.png

SHASTA

Serving the North State with Honest News and Entertainment
Donate $

UNFILTERED

  • Facebook
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Youtube

Amazon on Trial for Alleged Price Fixing


Amazon, the e-commerce behemoth that dominates online shopping, is facing its most serious antitrust challenges yet. Two major lawsuits—one from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and one from California—accuse the company of using its massive market power to suppress competition, punish lower prices elsewhere, and ultimately drive up costs for consumers across the internet.

theguardian.com Newly unsealed records reveal Amazon's price-fixing tactics, California attorney general claims | Amazon | The Guardian


The FTC’s Allegations: A Monopoly Built on Algorithms and Penalties

Filed in September 2023 in federal court in Washington state, the FTC lawsuit (joined by 17+ states) claims Amazon illegally maintains monopolies in two key markets: the “online superstore” for shoppers and online marketplace services for third-party sellers.

Key claims include:

  • Anti-discounting policies: Amazon allegedly demotes or penalizes sellers in search results, Prime eligibility, or visibility if they offer lower prices on rival sites like Walmart or their own websites. This creates a “price floor” that stops competitors from undercutting Amazon.

  • “Project Nessie”: A secret algorithm that tested price hikes on select products, predicting (and sometimes inducing) rivals to follow suit. The FTC says it generated over $1 billion in extra revenue for Amazon while raising prices for shoppers.

  • Tying Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA): Sellers must use Amazon’s costly fulfillment services to qualify for Prime badges (which drive the majority of sales), inflating costs passed on to consumers.


The FTC argues these tactics harm competition, degrade search quality, and let Amazon extract high fees while keeping prices artificially elevated everywhere.


California’s Allegations: Explicit Price-Fixing with Brands

California’s 2022 lawsuit, led by Attorney General Rob Bonta, focuses even more sharply on price-fixing. It accuses Amazon of using its “Fair Pricing Policy” and vendor agreements to block sellers from discounting elsewhere—stifling competition and inflating prices on Amazon and rival platforms.


On April 20, 2026, California unsealed explosive new evidence from a preliminary injunction filing. It includes specific emails showing Amazon pressuring major brands to contact competitors and demand price increases:

  • Amazon flagged lower prices on Walmart for Levi’s khaki pants and pushed Levi’s to get Walmart to raise them to $29.99. Levi’s complied, and Amazon matched the hike.

  • Similar coordination with Hanes and Target/Walmart on apparel prices.


AG Bonta called it “price fixing so explicitly and egregiously in writing.” The state says this scheme protects Amazon’s profits at consumers’ expense.

pilotonline.com Amazon coerced retailers to raise prices, AG Bonta


Legal Maneuvering: Delays, Denials, and Discovery Battles

Both cases have seen intense back-and-forth:

  • FTC case: Amazon’s motion to dismiss was largely denied in October 2024 (core federal claims survived). Trial dates have shifted multiple times due to discovery and overlapping cases—originally scheduled for October 2026, then for February 9, 2027, and now proposed for March 29, 2027.

  • California case: Amazon lost early dismissal attempts. On April 16, 2026, the court denied Amazon’s summary judgment motion on a key defense (that California antitrust laws don’t apply). Just days later, the state unsealed the damning evidence. California also filed for a preliminary injunction to halt the practices immediately.

A separate $2.5 billion FTC settlement over Prime “dark patterns” (unrelated to pricing) was finalized in 2025 and is already paying out refunds—but the big monopolization fights continue.


Target Trial Dates

  • California v. Amazon (San Francisco Superior Court): Trial set for January 19, 2027. Preliminary injunction hearing: July 23, 2026.

  • FTC v. Amazon (U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington): Bench trial scheduled for March 29, 2027.


Most Likely Outcome: Settlement, Not Breakup

Antitrust experts and market watchers give high odds (~70-80%) that both cases settle before or shortly after trial in 2027-2028. Full trials are risky and expensive; political shifts and Amazon’s arguments about fierce competition (from Walmart, Target, and AI-driven retail) weaken the monopoly narrative.


Expect behavioral remedies—rules restricting anti-discounting penalties, Project Nessie-style algorithms, and coercive vendor communications—plus possible fines or monitoring. Structural changes like breaking up Amazon’s marketplace or Prime are extremely unlikely. A light settlement would let Amazon tweak policies without disrupting its core business, while still delivering some relief to sellers and shoppers through freer pricing.


Critics say any win for regulators could lower prices in the long term. Amazon maintains its practices to benefit consumers with low prices and fast delivery. Either way, the cases highlight growing scrutiny of Big Tech platforms. Stay tuned—Shasta Unfiltered will keep watching.



Sources (concise list):

Shasta Unfiltered delivers straight talk on tech, business, and what it means for you. Questions or tips? Reach out.

bottom of page