Sarasota Woman Convicted for Threats Against MAGA Supporters:
- Rex Ballard
- 23 hours ago
- 4 min read
A Call for Violence Leads to Federal Prison Time
In a case highlighting the boundaries between free speech and criminal threats in the digital age, Desiree Doreen Segari, a 41-year-old resident of Sarasota, Florida, was convicted by a federal jury in Tampa on March 10, 2026. Segari was found guilty of interstate communication of a threat to injure under 18 U.S.C. § 875(c), stemming from two inflammatory TikTok videos she posted in August 2025. The videos, which urged viewers to shoot individuals wearing "MAGA" hats—symbolic of support for President Donald Trump—sparked widespread outrage and a swift FBI investigation. She now faces up to five years in federal prison, with sentencing scheduled for May 5, 2026, before U.S. District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle.

Woman convicted of threatening 'MAGA' supporters
The Incriminating Videos: "See MAGA, Pew Pew MAGA"
The controversy began on August 17, 2025, when Segari uploaded her first TikTok video, a platform with millions of users where content can go viral quickly. In the clip, she proclaimed a "new movement" called "see MAGA pew pew MAGA," explicitly calling for armed violence against Trump supporters. "Ok guys, so I would like to start a new movement called see MAGA [shoot] MAGA, because people like that respond to fear and terror and aggression not logic and empathy and I don't know, intelligence, it doesn't work for them so fear works so if we all get our guns and use our second amendment right and our common sense at this point this administration is begging us to rise up and revolt and you see somebody with a MAGA hat pew pew that's what we do, that's the way, it's the only way," Segari stated, while mimicking gunfire with hand gestures. She further escalated her rhetoric, saying, "Put them back in their basements, make them scared again to be racist, homophobic, and terrible just awful [expletive]," and "MAGA people deserve to be terrified and scared to walk in the streets because they should know that real Americans are gonna [mouths expletive] kill them."
The video's caption encouraged widespread dissemination: "#seemagapewpewmaga starting a new trend, hope it catches on. Please spread the word. Share this video. Repost it. Use the hashtag all over the internet. Let's go guys. It's time to fight back in a potentially effective manner."
The following day, August 18, 2025, Segari posted a follow-up video reinforcing her message. "See MAGA pew pew MAGA, see MAGA pew pew MAGA, see MAGA pew pew MAGA so these [expletive] know we ain’t here to play," she repeated, again using gun-mimicking gestures. These videos were transmitted across state lines via TikTok's servers, meeting the interstate commerce element required for federal charges.
FBI Investigation and Indictment
The videos quickly drew attention, leading to reports to law enforcement. The FBI Tampa Division initiated an investigation, recognizing the content as a potential threat rather than protected speech. On September 18, 2025, a federal grand jury in the Middle District of Florida indicted Segari on one count of transmitting an interstate threat. The case was assigned to Judge Mizelle, who presided over pretrial matters, including denying two motions for her recusal filed by Segari. The defense argued bias due to Mizelle's husband's prior role in the Trump administration and public comments on threats, but the judge ruled that such connections did not warrant disqualification.
The Trial: Free Speech Defense Rejected
The trial commenced in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Prosecutors, led by Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael Sinacore, presented the videos as evidence of true threats intended to incite fear and violence. Segari's defense contended that her statements were protected political hyperbole under the First Amendment, too vague to constitute threats against specific individuals, and directed at a broad group rather than a single person.
Judge Mizelle clarified that the statute's use of "person" encompasses plural forms, allowing threats against groups to qualify. The jury was tasked with determining if the statements were "true threats"—communications a reasonable person would interpret as serious expressions of intent to harm—rather than satire or mere advocacy. After deliberation, the jury convicted Segari on March 10, 2026, rejecting her free speech claims.

Trump Campaign's MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN Hat Wins Symbol of the Year Vote for 2016 | Symbolic Systems Program
Sentencing and Potential Penalties
Segari remains free pending sentencing but faces a maximum of five years in prison, followed by possible supervised release. U.S. Attorney Roger B. Handberg (or Gregory W. Kehoe in some reports) emphasized the case's role in combating online threats: "There is no room in civilized society for violent threats based on race or political affiliation." The conviction underscores the Department of Justice's commitment to holding individuals accountable for digital incitements to violence.
Public Reaction and Broader Implications
The case exploded on social media, with the original videos gaining traction after being reposted on platforms like X. Accounts such as @libsoftiktok amplified the content, leading to viral outrage and calls for accountability. Reactions ranged from celebrations of the verdict as a win for "FAFO" (f*** around and find out) to debates over free speech limits.
