top of page
SU Mountain Logo SM.png

SHASTA

Serving the North State with Honest News and Entertainment
Donate $

UNFILTERED

  • Facebook
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Youtube

Trump's Geopolitical Gambit: Playing Multi-Dimensional Chess Against Old Empires and New Rivals

As President Donald J. Trump's second term accelerates into 2026, a pattern of aggressive foreign policy maneuvers is emerging, prompting analysts to question whether these actions are isolated responses or pieces in a larger strategic puzzle. From military interventions in Venezuela and Iran to disputes over the Panama Canal and Greenland, Trump's administration appears to be pursuing dual objectives: dismantling lingering influences of historical British imperialism and exerting indirect pressure on China's global ambitions. Experts describe this as "multi-dimensional chess," where surface-level fixes mask deeper plays to redefine the world order under an "America First" banner.


While mainstream coverage often frames these events as standalone solutions to longstanding U.S. complaints—such as curbing Venezuelan migration or halting Iran's nuclear program—deeper analysis reveals interconnected strategies. "Trump is not just reacting; he's reshaping the board," said China analyst Gordon Chang in a recent interview, echoing sentiments from think tanks like Promethean Action, which views the moves as a crusade against colonial-era networks.


View the Gordon Chang Interview here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-3cRrquknc


Bold Interventions Signal Broader Agendas

The year began with a dramatic U.S. military operation in Venezuela on January 3, 2026, dubbed "Operation Absolute Resolve." American forces conducted airstrikes in Caracas, capturing President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, on narco-terrorism charges. Trump announced that the U.S. would oversee Venezuela's transition, seizing control of its vast oil reserves—estimated at $3 billion in sanctioned assets—and negotiating new energy deals. Casualties included at least 40 individuals, many identified as Cuban security personnel, while Delcy Rodríguez assumed acting presidency under U.S. warnings of compliance.


Writers Barbara Boyd and Susan Kokinda, analysts at Promethean Action, argue that this strike targets "British imperial parasites," linking Maduro's regime to offshore financial systems rooted in colonial legacies, such as British Virgin Islands havens used to launder cartel funds. This view ties into historical disputes, such as the 1895 Venezuela-British Guiana border crisis, positioning Trump's action as a revival of the Monroe Doctrine for sovereign nation-building.

Making sense of the US military operation in Venezuela | Brookings


Just weeks later, on February 28, 2026, joint U.S.-Israeli airstrikes rocked Iran, killing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, former President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and up to 48 other officials. Operations extended into March, with U.S. forces sinking Iranian warships and reporting minimal American casualties amid retaliatory strikes on Gulf assets. Trump justified the move as essential regime change to eliminate terrorism sponsors and nuclear threats, issues plaguing U.S. policy since the 1979 revolution.


Once again, the writers for Promethean Action frame this as the dismantling of a "118-year British financial empire," tracing its roots to the 1908 Anglo-Persian Oil Company concession and the 1953 MI6-CIA coup against Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh. "This is not Iraq 2.0," a Promethean analyst stated. "It's the culmination of Trump's efforts to redirect resources from imperial extraction to sovereign development." Unlike past U.S. presidents who have sponsored regime change, Trump is not making any effort to install a new figurehead; he is inviting the citizens of Iran to seize control and create their own government.

From Tehran to Dubai: Geolocated videos show the shockwaves of US-Israeli strikes — and Iran's retaliation | CNN


China expert analyst Gordon Chang points out that the actions in Iran, also expose one of China's primary Achilles heels - its reliance on oil imports. With the U.S. exercising control of oil from Venezuela and now potentially Iran, it will place increased pressure on China.



Closer to home, Panama's Supreme Court ruled in January 2026 to void concessions for ports at Balboa and Cristóbal held by Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison, handing operations to Danish firm APM Terminals. This followed Trump's 2025 threats to seize the canal, citing unfair fees and foreign influence since the 1999 handover from U.S. control.


In the Arctic, Trump's push for Greenland—reviving a 1946 Truman-era proposal—emphasizes strategic resources and trade routes. European NATO deployments have been labeled "suicide missions" by critics, with Trump tying it to breaking "80 years of imperial control," referencing 1920s U.S. plans against British-Canadian threats.

Panama Canal authorizes transits for larger, wider ships – Professional Mariner


Challenging Globalist Institutions: Board of Peace, WEF, and NATO

Trump's strategy extends beyond territorial moves, targeting what some call extensions of British-style globalism. In January 2026, he established the Board of Peace, initially for Gaza reconstruction under UN Security Council Resolution 2803 (2025). As chairman for life, Trump controls membership, with nations buying permanent seats for $1 billion—funds he directs. The Board's inaugural meeting in February secured $17 billion in pledges, but key European allies like the UK, France, Germany, and Canada abstained, fearing it would undermine the UN. Brookings Institution experts describe it as a "symptom of multilateral crisis," positioning it as a selective alternative to globalist forums.


At the World Economic Forum in Davos that same month, Trump's speech lambasted European leaders for migration policies, low defense spending, and "loser windmills," while targeting figures like Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and French President Emmanuel Macron. While the mainstream media focused on fact-checks, they missed the main point; the address attacked the "old world" orders that have been trying to establish the "new world" order.


NATO reforms further illustrate this. At the June 2025 Hague Summit, Trump secured commitments for allies to reach 5% of GDP on defense by 2035 (3.5% military, 1.5% security-related), criticizing free-riding tied to post-WWII dependencies. The 2025 National Security Strategy (NSS) calls for Europe to lead its defense, halting expansion (e.g., no Ukraine membership) and hinting at U.S. "quiet quitting." More recently, Secretary of State Marco Rubio's address at the Munich Security Conference lambasted NATO members for their globalist policies, arguing that they were weakening the alliance. While he was very critical of them, he received a standing ovation.


Domestically, Trump's March 2025 executive order created a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, stockpiling cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana to hedge against Federal Reserve control, established in 1913 amid alleged British banking influence. This halts central bank digital currency plans and proposes anti-"debanking" rules, with nominee Kevin Warsh for Fed chair aiming to make the U.S. the "crypto capital."


Encircling China: Oil Leverage and Tariff Wars

Interwoven is a campaign to pressure China without direct conflict. China's economy depends on 70% imported oil (11 million barrels daily), with Venezuela and Iran supplying 17-18% at discounts via Belt and Road Initiative deals—$60 billion in Venezuelan loans and $400 billion with Iran. Trump's seizures disrupt these, potentially spiking prices and straining Beijing's manufacturing.


Chang likens it to Mao's "surrounding the cities from the countryside," cutting peripheral allies. The Panama ruling blocks Chinese BRI footholds, while Greenland counters Arctic ambitions.


Tariffs amplify this: Starting with a 10% fentanyl-related levy in February 2025, escalating to 145% by April, deals in May, August, and November reduced some rates (e.g., fentanyl to 10%) for Chinese concessions, such as soybean purchases. A February 2026 Supreme Court ruling invalidated certain tariffs, slashing rates by two-thirds, but remaining duties (up to 45%) are projected to generate $1.2 trillion through 2035. Trump will likely reinstate any tariffs impacted by the recent ruling using other laws, so any relief China may have been hoping for will be short-lived.


A Dual Strategy for a Revitalized America?

These moves aren't contradictory, experts say. Dismantling "imperial remnants" weakens the frameworks that enable China's rise, while creating leverage for concessions on trade, fentanyl, or Taiwan. The NSS hints at duality: Western Hemisphere primacy against China, alongside "global balances" for multipolar cooperation.


As Trump operates "several moves ahead," the full picture may emerge only in retrospect. For now, his gambit challenges old empires and constrains new ones, potentially ushering in a redefined global order.


Sources:

Media's Surface-Level Narrative (Isolated Events)

First Strategy: Dismantling British Imperial Influences

Second Strategy: Encircling and Pressuring China

Video Links to Support the Thesis

These videos provide expert analysis and discussions aligning with the essay's thesis. I've prioritized those from Gordon Chang (China encirclement) and Promethean Updates (anti-British imperialism), plus Trump's own speeches for context.

bottom of page