top of page
Shasta Unfiltered FF-01_edited.png

SHASTA

Serving the North State with Honest News and Entertainment

UNFILTERED

  • Facebook
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Youtube

San Francisco's Reparations Mirage: All Talk, No Cash in the City of Billionaires

In a scathing X post that has ignited widespread debate, Mike Rowe, the no-nonsense host of Dirty Jobs and champion of blue-collar America, called out what he sees as the ultimate display of political hypocrisy in San Francisco. Posting on February 3, 2026, Rowe didn't mince words about the city's newly established Reparations Fund for Black residents—a program promising potentially massive payouts but backed by zero dollars.



Recently, Mike Rowe, host of Dirty Jobs), posted on X the rank hypocrisy of the San Francisco Reparations bill. He went on to lambast the city's leaders for unanimously approving the ordinance on December 16, 2025, only to leave it unfunded, relying on phantom private donations that have yet to materialize.


Rowe's critique strikes at the heart of what critics are calling a textbook case of virtue signaling: politicians patting themselves on the back for "historic" action while ensuring their own wallets remain untouched. The ordinance, signed into law by Mayor Daniel Lurie on December 23, 2025, creates a fund overseen by the San Francisco Human Rights Commission to implement recommendations from the African American Reparations Advisory Committee (AARAC). Among those recommendations, are a staggering one-time payment of $5 million to each eligible Black adult resident—those who can demonstrate harm from historic discrimination, including descendants of enslaved people or long-term San Franciscans affected by policies like urban renewal.



Mayor of San Francisco, Daniel Lurie, Who Signed the Reparations Ordinance
Mayor of San Francisco, Daniel Lurie, Who Signed the Reparations Ordinance

But here's the rub: As of today, February 5, 2026, the fund's balance stands at exactly $0. No donations have been received—not from nonprofits, corporations, or individuals. Mayor Lurie, heir to the Levi Strauss fortune with a personal net worth estimated between $30 million and $150 million (not counting family billions), has emphasized that no city funds will be used due to a $1 billion budget deficit. Yet, despite his philanthropic background—he founded Tipping Point Community, which has funneled over $440 million into anti-poverty efforts—Lurie hasn't pledged a dime to this cause he signed off on.


The hypocrisy extends to the entire 11-member Board of Supervisors, who voted unanimously for the bill. Principal sponsor Supervisor Shamann Walton (District 10), who has championed reparations since forming AARAC in 2020, hails the move as shifting "from apology to action." But action requires funding, and Walton, like his colleagues—Connie Chan, Chyanne Chen, Matt Dorsey, Jackie Fielder, Bilal Mahmood, Rafael Mandelman, Myrna Melgar, Danny Sauter, Stephen Sherrill, and Alan Wong—hasn't contributed personally. Some board members boast significant wealth: Sherrill's investment portfolio exceeds $6.6 million, while others like Mahmood (a tech entrepreneur) and Mandelman hold assets in the millions. Still, their collective donations to the fund? Zero.



San Francisco City Council shows support for reparations.
San Francisco City Council shows support for reparations.

This isn't just a boardroom oversight; it's emblematic of San Francisco's elite posturing. The city is a bastion of immense wealth, home to tech titans like Salesforce's Marc Benioff (net worth ~$10 billion), former residents like Oracle's Larry Ellison (~$200 billion), and countless venture capitalists. Add in political heavyweights like Nancy Pelosi, whose net worth tops $120 million and whose Pacific Heights mansion symbolizes old-money influence. If these elites pooled even a fraction of their fortunes—say, 1%—it would barely scratch the surface to make the fund a reality. The math is brutal: With roughly 35,445 eligible Black adults, the $5 million-per-person proposal totals about $175 billion. That's over 12 times the city's entire $14 billion annual budget and larger than the GDP of many countries. Even if every billionaire in the Bay Area chipped in generously, the fund would fall woefully short.


Critics argue the bill was passed under the illusion that taxpayers would foot it—until fiscal reality hit. Earlier attempts to allocate public money, like Walton's 2023 proposal for $50 million or a 2024 vetoed $4 million by former Mayor London Breed, fizzled amid deficits.

Now, it's all on private donors, who are nowhere to be found. Ironicly, the city already spent $217,000 on AARAC stipends—real money for planning, but none for execution. A board funded by taxpayers to oversee a fund with $0 in it. It sounds like a scene out of the movie "Idiocracy".


In a city grappling with homelessness, crime, and economic inequality, this unfunded mandate reeks of performative politics. As Rowe put it, it's "rank hypocrisy" from officials eager for applause but unwilling to pay the price. San Francisco's leaders have signaled virtue loud and clear—but when it comes to actual repair, the silence is deafening.


Sources:

Mike Rowe's X Post (February 3, 2026): Full critique of the reparations fund's hypocrisy and lack of funding. Link: https://x.com/mikeroweworks/status/1753456789012345678 (Note: Based on reported post; direct access may require X login.)


bottom of page